I know a lot of people are thinking this is a bad thing but I for one think it’s great. I am a huge fan of Jony Ive’s work and can’t wait to see what he brings to the table on the UI side.
I know a lot of people are thinking this is a bad thing but I for one think it’s great. I am a huge fan of Jony Ive’s work and can’t wait to see what he brings to the table on the UI side.
I know it’s been a while since I paid attention to this site but I think it’s time to breath some new life into it.
I’ve been talking to some of my tech friends and some feel Apple has not done anything big with the iPhone. My question is what is the next big thing? I think it’s clear that at this point the smartphone market has hit a wall. All the players are on the bleeding edge there is nothing new to be done. I am sure someone will scream at me and say what about NFC, but we all know NFC is not ready for prime time. I’d love for some people that have it to tell me how often you actually use it. Don’t get me wrong I think one day NFC will be as standard as bluetooth or bluetooth and NFC will be the same thing with the advances in 4.0.
We have reached a point in the smartphone market where there isn’t a next big thing. It’s kind of like when Windows 95 came out. It didn’t really change much till we saw vista. It was just iterative changes to make the system better. The problem is we all expected to be swept off our feet like we were in 2007. Unfortunately I don’t think that will happen again for a while and one of the reasons is not a lack of innovation in the tech sector but a lack of innovation in the battery sector. At this point we are trying to make low power chips and optimize systems to not draw to much power, because batteries are same as they have been for years. While we can figure out how to make processors smaller with more transistors we can not figure out how to make batters smaller with more or even the same juice. I don’t expect to see any major innovation until we can get past that hurdle.

Yesterday I finally flipped the switch disabling iTunes match. I really wanted to like it. I really, really wanted to like it. It was my favorite feature and I couldn’t wait for it to be released. The moment it was turned on I got it and waited all weekend for it to match and upload my music. Once it was done, I was like a kid on Christmas. Wide eyed and excited, I fired up the iPod app on my iPhone and it promptly froze. About ten seconds later it came back and started showing me my twenty two thousand songs. Then I went to play one and it froze again. About five second later it started playing. It’s rare for Apple to release something that is imperfect but in this case I think they missed the mark.
iTunes match is supposed to match the music in your iTunes library up to 25,000 sounds and provide it in iCloud for up to five devices to stream/download. Unfortunately, it does not perform like you would expect an apple product to.
First off, I have found that most songs with explicit lyrics are censored. While with most music this isn’t an issue, if you are listening to, say, Eminem, you will only hear about every other word. Or maybe a little old school GN’R, how about “Get In The Ring?” I think they censored the whole thing. I searched for a way to fix this and the only option I found was to buy the explicit version of the song directly from iTunes, then it would play the proper version. This is not a valid option as I own a lot of this music and have ripped it from CD’s. I am not about to purchase it again. I understand that there is no way to match an old CD for the censored version but maybe an option asking if you want explicit lyrics or not. I believe you can set parental levels for children in iTunes already.
Second, a lot of songs do not match properly. I started noticing live versions of songs that I don’t own and couldn’t find the studio version. For some reason my whole Billy Joel collection is now live versions when listening on my iPhone or iPad.
Third, when listening to music it skips tracks I want to listen to because it gets stuck trying to download them. This is really annoying, and it does it while shuffling too. It does not only happen on the cellular network either, it happens on my home WiFi as well. Normally, after fighting with it, I give up and am finally able to listen to that song 3 days later when it eventually decides to download it.
Lastly, (and this is the most annoying issue) it makes the iPod slow as hell. When first launching the app it takes about ten seconds for it to become response, even if it has been playing in the background it takes at least six seconds. From there it takes another five seconds to scroll and once you try to play a song it takes another four seconds. I do not expect to see response time like this from any Apple product and it’s super annoying if you are listening to music while driving. From a Google search of the issue I know I am not the only one experiencing these issues. I also can’t find a reason they are occurring. A lot of forums say it’s due to the artwork being loaded. That doesn’t make sense as apps like Pandora can load artwork and the song nearly instantaneously.
I really hope Apple is aware of these issues and corrects them. In the meantime I will be using Spotify.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the department of justice has filed a lawsuit against apple along with five of the nation’s largest publishers, for allegedly conspiring to limit competition for e-book pricing.
The lawsuit was filed in Manhattan federal court by the U.S Depart of Justice’s Antitrust Divisions. The lawsuit alleges that Apple and the publishers made an agreement where retails prices would no longer be competitive, and Apple would guarantee a 30% commission on each e-book sold.
According to a source familiar with the case. A settlement by some of the publishers is expected to be filed on Wednesday. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to discuss the matter at a press conference on Wednesday.
Check out the full story below.
DOJ Sues Apple, Publishers Over E-Book Price-Fixing – WSJ.com.
Yesterday it was announced that Facebook acquired Instagram for a whopping 1 billion dollars. Can you say tech bubble? Anyway, that’s a different discussion. This acquisition seems to have spawned a lot of hate across the inter-webs and every other post on my RSS feed is how to backup your photos and delete Instagram. Aside from the privacy issues Facebook has had in the past, which they seem to have fixed, I don’t understand why people think this is a bad thing.
Instagram makes sharing your photo’s easy. They also give you options to put some cool effects on them. But at its root it’s meant to be social and the one thing a social network needs to thrive is people. Instagram has around 50 million users, while Facebook has over 800 million users. I think I am following about 22 people and being followed by about 17. While on Facebook I am friends with about 400 people. I think the integration will get more people using Instagram and make it better.
Let’s not forget that up until this point, Instagram has been funded completely via venture capital funds. They have no revenue model to speak of. If they were to stay independent, at some point this would need to change. I can only think of three ways that could happen. One way is to start adding adds to the picture feeds which no one would like. Another is to come out with a tiered pricing model like basic/free account and premium. The last would be to start charging for the app. Chances are it would be a hybrid of all of them, but no matter what, it, would take away from the user experience. I’m sure a plan for revenue would have to be worked out soon, as with 50 million people all posting pictures online, storage is an issue. Now that they have the might of Facebook behind them, these issues will cease to exist.
One of the other complaints I have been seeing is “what if Facebook kills the app?” While it’s entirely possible that Facebook saw a weakness in themselves that Instagram was exploiting, it’s doubtful that was their motivation for the acquisition. It’s not a good business decision to buy a product for 1 billion dollars just to destroy it. I think it’s much more likely that they will bring the Instagram experience to the photos section of your Facebook page, another win for all of us. Even the following piece can remain, all Facebook needs to do is integrate the following piece built into Facebook.
In the end I think the integration is a great thing. Don’t run off and delete Instagram just yet, unless you are one of the few outliers that hate Facebook and don’t have an account.

The rumors about the iTV or iPanel have been floating around the internet for over a year now. But there is still no solid evidence to back them. So what’s the deal? Will we ever see an Apple television?
I can see why this rumor is gaining popularity. It seems that since Apple entered the consumer electronics market, they have been gobbling up market share for whatever type of device they release. At this point Apple is king in music and communications, and has a huge piece of the computer market. So, of course, if you are trying to predict what market they will move into next, the logical leap would be TV. They have already dipped their toes in the pool with the Apple TV.
Now let’s think about how Apple actually works. Apple tends to find a hole in the market that no one else knows exists and gives you a product that blows your mind. Back in 1999, no one was saying “wow, I wish I had a small white little hard drive that could connect to my computer, download digital music and store all my music all with out the need of a CD.” We were saying “hey man check it out, my disc man has a whole minute of skip protection.” But then, in 2001, Apple released the iPod and people shit their pants. Something similar happened in 2007 with the iPhone, then again with the iPad.
Now let’s talk about Television. Its one purpose is to watch stuff. No matter how many features it has they all lead back to that singular purpose: watching stuff. I’m sure if Apple releases a TV it will be amazing. But at the end of the day you will still connect cable, or satellite to it, and you will still hook your blu-ray and game console to it. Sure maybe it will have SIRI and you can talk to it, you will be able to hook your iPhone and iPad to it to control it. But why would they jump into an over-saturated market that they are likely to fail in when you can do most of these things already by hooking a $99 box to your TV? It doesn’t make sense. The television market is owned by Samsung and Sony. If Apple jumps in, their TVs will need to be competitively priced, which is unlikely given Apple’s pricing model. Additionally, people don’t replace their TVs every year or every other year. Most people keep them till they burn out. Tell me you don’t still have friends with CRTs.
Here is what we are more likely to see and no one else is saying this. The iPanel is a monitor!!! Not just any monitor, most likely a capacitive touch screen monitor. It’s not gonna replace your mouse or keyboard, but it will be an additional interface device for the user. You wanna zoom a screen just pinch like you do already with the iPad. Apple is already moving in a direction to merge the lines between their mobile devices and their computers. So this is the next logical step. There is a hole in the way we control our Macs compared to the mobile devices, we can not touch what we see. The reason I say it will not take away the mouse and keyboard is because you can not sit there all day with your arms in-front of you to control a computer but you can do specific tasks in that matter. Photo editing removing red eye, swiping to different full screen windows, and more. Combine that with a SIRI integration and the iPanel begins to make a whole lot of sense.
I could be wrong maybe an Apple TV will be released. If it is I predict it will be Apple’s next flop. It will be priced to high and simply won’t sell. Given the massive success out of Apple recently we do tend to forget they have the occasional failure. Remember the first Apple TV, or the Time Capsule? However if I am right and they release a capacitive touch screen, iMonitor, and couple that with a SIRI integration in OSX, it will be a huge success.
Apple have taken action against the Flashback Trojan virus for the 2nd time in one week, by rolling out another update.
The update is available via the standard “Software Update…” option.
If you aren’t aware of this story, your Mac could be one of 600,000 affected by a trojan, reportedly including Mac’s at Apples’ Headquarters in Cupertino.
If you think one of your machines may be infected, visit F-Secure to see how to use the Terminal to find out. As with anything that involves using the Terminal, please be 100% sure you know what you are doing.
As ever, remember to visit us @ www.tech-ninja.co.uk and follow us on Twitter @techninjanews
Source: 9TO5Mac